After I had my slight psychological break and went on this rant last week, I received a lot of great support both from my readers here and the people who know me in real life and stalk me on facebook.
Not surprisingly, I’m not alone in my feeeeeeelings about food.
Or perhaps that is better phrased as my feelings ABOUT my feelings about food. Yup, you’re gonna have to read that sentence at least three times. It’s ok. I’ll wait.
Sadly, I don’t come to you today, on the final day of my Whole 30 with all the answers. In fact, I don’t really have any more than I had last week. I continue to make myself aware when I’m eating for emotional reasons, and I’m continuing to try to understand the link between the two.
Today the male half of my favorite blogging couple Bob, of Bob and Meg over at (Not As) Big Bob wrote the first part of what will be a five part series on his feelings about an article he read recently called the Stigma of Obesity.
First off, check out Bob’s post. Insightful stuff. I’m always amazed at his knowledge and perspective and how, even though we are two very different people, we struggle with some very similar things.
In “The Stigma of Obesity” the author references an article by a physician at an obesity clinic with a group of bariatric surgeons written by Karen Hitchcock. Being on this kind of quest for knowledge about the how’s and whys behind food in culture, I read it.
Karen Hitchcock, you are kind of the cat’s meow to me right now.
Sure, it’s written from the perspective of a skinny person who has always been skinny, understood moderation, and self-control. In the first paragraph or two, I kind of want to slap her. But then she took me along this journey of tough love and being on the other side of the coin when it comes to the obesity epidemic that is affecting our world as we know it.
Below is an excerpt from her article “Fat City-What can stop obesity?” Please, follow the link and read the rest. I admit, it’s not short or a quick read, but her perspective has given me a bit of a new one of my own.
This won’t be the last blog about this, but hopefully instead the first of many in my quest for knowledge, and ultimately health.
“I once attended a hospital lecture on the genetic determinants of obesity delivered by a specialist physician. The doctor giving the talk was very fat. As he went on, his face got red and stains of sweat spread from his armpits. Obesity is genetic, he argued, wiping his brow: obesity is a disease. He said: If you make a fat person thin, you are sentencing them to a lifetime of hunger.
This depends on your definition of hunger. Eating is not a purely rational, biological act. I can give you a diet that will keep you full all day and make you lose weight, but it won’t be very entertaining: it will be mainly made up of watery vegetables like cabbage and celery, egg whites and very lean meat. The pain of abstinence, of unmet desire, is something quite separate from the pain of an empty stomach. The pleasures of eating are complex and multifaceted. In our society, consumption is a form of entertainment and pleasure. Eating is part of this: from the theatre of a meal at a fine-dining establishment to a bag of chips augmenting the television-viewing experience. Most people do not overeat because of a feeling of hunger emanating from the stomach; they are giving in to a desire to consume – they are seeking pleasure or relief, or hoping to fill a void.”**
**Bold content has been done by me to emphasize the points that most hit home, not by the origional author.**